You Got Style
· Pointed Takes on Style Delineated ·
January 5, 2003
« Rube Goldberg Style | Main | An Ode Owed to the Low Art of Footnotes »
· High Style ·
Should you wonder, here's Lanchester's prime literary example — Jean-Paul Sartre in The Critique of Dialectical Reason (1960):
Well, if you say so, Mr. Sartre! Of course, passed by his hard-working New Yorker fact checkers, Lanchester's view is itself more fairly, subtly, and rightly presented: "There are a number of valid responses to these arguments," he writes: "They sure don't make public intellectuals like they used to. Another might be: I'm not sure Sartre's arguments constitute more than a footnote to his work in 'L'être et le Néant.' A third might be: What was he on?" The answer, it appears, is "corydrane, a form of amphetamine," Lanchester avers, "mixed with, of all things, aspirin."
Although I hardly wish to dispute Lanchester's claim, as you read his essay, ask yourself how Sartre's stylistic "alterity" — to borrow Sartre's language — precisely marks a more serious form of philosophical substance abuse? For taken in the larger "totalising" context of Western thought, it might be said, as old Styles might say, just "substance abuse" Aristotle-Aquinas style — meaning: Sartre doesn't much care for you dear reader rhetorically, nor for that matter, logically, for God, either. As for Sartre, well, Lanchester does find the goods on the guy.
Meanwhile, Lanchester's rhetoric and logic are clearly uppers.
After writing this post, I needed a drink.Permalink
On Aging — De Facto and De Jure Style
Scholarly, Critical, Theoretical Academic Librarianship, Leon Howard Style
Figures & Tropes
Grammar & Syntax