You Got Style
· Pointed Takes on Style Delineated ·
February 22, 2003
« Compromising Style: Malcolm Cowley on Socspeak | Main | A Well Thought-Out English Paper »
· On Parsing English Justice ·
These few words appeared in the court I sat in Wednesday. They brought to mind an old writing maxim; you've heard it: "prefer active verbs." The injunction invites verbal action from stylish English writers. Indeed, the best handbooks repeat it, zealous E-primers fetishize it, and alert, really competent writers follow it — maybe more dutifully than religiously. I know I do.
But Wednesday, asked by a judge to be his appointed tool of local justice, I knew I was in trouble. For I'd hoped I couldn't be, and when I wasn't, I dreaded I'd in fact wronged someone. I felt an essential guilt weighing, metaphysically, on anyone standing before the old bar of English justice.
It wasn't a matter of identity politics. For I'd not been asked if I was rich or poor, liberal or conservative, gay or straight, or a host of other oppositions bedeviling thought today. All I'd been asked was one question: could I be just? The categories figuring in my oath — "facts," "truth," "evidence," "reason" — were all good metaphysical abstractions, but when taken from me by a "peremptory challenge," I felt myself then pleading at the bar. For I couldn't be a juror, since I'd been judged and, indeed, found wanting.
Although I've known that's crucial to our system, today I thought to pass the explanation on to a better writer, G. K. Chesterton. Since Chesterton became an English juror (and I just a reject), I thought you might like his Twelve Men. By the way, consider me Chesterton's "bicycle thief."Permalink
The Supreme Court's Miller-El v. Cockrell decision, released yesterday, makes my reponse to a "peremptory challenge" even more significant. Today I thought to include our high court's decision.
On Aging — De Facto and De Jure Style
Scholarly, Critical, Theoretical Academic Librarianship, Leon Howard Style
Figures & Tropes
Grammar & Syntax